Vitalik’s Serious Joke: The Case for Ending Ethereum Inflation

6m read

Nevertheless, the proposed issuance cap has also been the brunt of heavy criticism. And while rewards would decrease as the total ETH supply converges toward its limit - potentially disincentivizing miners - Buterin said that inflation poses a similar risk. While the inflation rate on ethereum is currently quite low, Buterin contended that even small rates of inflation are a "huge deal" in the context of financial market returns. Zamfir, for example, has spoken out against putting a limit on the issuance of ether in the past. "Ether has a primary intrinsic purpose on the ethereum protocol, that is, to be consumed as a resource with which to run calculations upon a computational machine," an independent ethereum developer, Darryl Morris, wrote in a blog post.

Article Preview

It turns out, Vitalik wasn't exactly joking.

Sure, that might be what most people thought when ethereum's creator published a controversial proposal on April Fool's Day, but the post has prompted a very real, very serious conversation about whether the underlying economics of the world's second-largest cryptocurrency should be altered.

In fact, in the weeks since the concept was first floated, dialogue has only gotten more heated about the idea that a limit could be placed on the total number of ether, ethereum's cryptocurrency, that could ever be created. And while it's long been a contentious topic (there isn't currently a cap), the rate at which new coins are being introduced into the market has been growing.


Read the full article @ Coindesk